iPad’s camera pulled in the eleventh hour?
A new set of photos appeared this week that showed a camera mold within a currently shipping iPad bezel. We’re not quite sure what to think here… it makes sense that Apple could have pulled the camera last minute due to a consistent issue in testing. We’re surprised that repair companies are purchasing legitimate parts for this device already. It is not typical for knock-offs to be ready before a device actually debuts, and it’s very unusual for someone to spend enough time with a part that they could duplicate it to exact specifications.
It’s possible that Mission:Repair knows people very deeply rooted in Apple engineering or parts supply… more power to them.
Parts aside, it doesn’t surprise us at all that Apple would need to pull the camera at the last minute. Our resident technician, Josh, knows that the MacBook camera design (nearly identical to the supposed iPad camera) has never been great at staying in place with a lot of movement. The iPad will be moved, a lot. We’re guessing that Apple pulled the plug on the camera because it kept getting dislodged in the “street” tests. They could just need to re-examine the way the camera sits in the machine. It could also have something to do with the iPad 3G: the top of the iPad’s rear panel is completely devoted to the 3G signal. We don’t know what the complications could be, but the antennas would be right next to the camera in that version.
We would have preferred to see the iPad delayed another month or so if it was really going to have a camera. It’s not hurting Apple to put it off for a month — at least in our minds. That camera would have made the iPad infinitely more appealing to many people but we, like most people, are looking forward to the 2nd revision.


about 1 month ago
You seem to be missing one of the possibilities here, that Apple have designed the part for the future addition of a camera.
It makes perfect sense to me, since Apple will want to keep parts the same if possible. Why have two versions of the bezel for the first and second generation iPad? If they ship the first one with the camera mount in place but don’t actually add the camera until next years model. They save themselves money in all sorts of areas.
I’m a bit annoyed at the business model anyway, lots of companies do this now. They deliberately hold back on features for a future version, what ever happened to genuine innovation and improvement?
Like or Dislike:
1
0
about 1 month ago
You make a good point… I’d love to believe that you’re way off. But I agree that many companies deliberately withhold features to make the second revision more attractive. Apple hasn’t been guilty of this that I’m aware of at least — the lack of a camera in the iPod touch does make me pause for a second.
I’ve heard from the inside that Apple withholds things from a product in order to just push it through and start selling it quicker. For example, the iTunes music store was supposed to be in the first generation iPhone from the beginning, but they didn’t have the bugs worked out so they postponed the release until later.
My inner Apple fanboy doesn’t want to believe that they would deliberately mess with us like that.
Like or Dislike:
0
0